Sophie Calle, top row, Douleur Exquise, Mise en scène: Frank Gehry & Edwin Chan, Exhibition view, 2007, Luxembourg and Grande Région, European Capital of Culture 2007, Rotunda 1 de Bonnevoie, Luxembourg, Curated by Erna Hecey, bottom left, Sophie Calle, Douleur Exquise, 2007, Performance, Centre Pompidou, bottom right, Douleur exquise – Après la douleur, 1984-2003, Vue de l'exposition M'as-tu-vue au Centre Georges Pompidou, Paris, 2003, 36 quadriptyques comprenant chacun un texte brodé sur panneau de lin gris de 120 x 160 cm et une photographie couleur de 68 x 48 cm, un texte brodé sur panneau de lin blanc de 120 x 160 cm et une photographie noir et blanc ou couleur de 68 x 48 cm, tous encadrés, © SABAM Belgium 2009, Courtesy Galerie Emmanuel Perrotin, Paris / Miami; Arndt & Partner, Berlin / Zurich; Koyanagi, Tokyo ; Gallery Paula Cooper, NY. |
Louise Bourgeois, The Curved House, 1990. Marbre. 35,5 x 93,9 x 33 cm., Courtesy Cheim & Read, New York; Galerie Karsten Greve, Cologne; Allemagne, Galerie Hauser et Wirth, Zürich, Suisse. Copyright Adagp, Paris 2007. |
Geographical airs – and areas |
Centre Pompidou By VALERIE GUILLAUME Late in 2006, the ashes of the American actor James Doohan (1920-2005), the famous “Scotty” in the TV series Star Trek,were scattered in space by Space Services, Inc., a company specializing in space funerals 1. The event goes beyond biography — it shifts existence and history towards the ultimate, cosmic meaning. Once more, this switch in perspective tests the reciprocal boundaries of the reality discourse and the fictional narrative which, by sidestepping the saturation of meaning lying in wait for simple binary contrasts, lead to intentions of interpretative fields of non-differentiation, complementarity, interference, interaction and competitiveness. The "Paris Airs" exhibition, in its “Landscape, Architecture, Design” section, is part and parcel of this prospect, by the fact that it mobilizes composite tools and schemes of interpretation, which are, afortiori, rarely compared. For example, the many-shaped partition produced by the designers Erwan and Ronan Bouroullec, which, in the exhibition, here replaces the traditional picture railof the set arrangement, and, elsewhere, leans against the botanist Patrick Blanc’s plant wall.At the risk of creating tensions and contradictions, the four sequences of the circuit round the exhibition, respectively titled “Territorial Strata”, “Vertical Landscapes”, “Corporal Spheres”, and “Ascensional Horizons”, converge towards a pivotal and decidedly dynamic point. Sixteen projects presented by architects, urban activists, landscape artists and designers, to which the sociologist Latour and the photographer Émilie Hermantadda field survey, compare their areas of investigation with our “human condition”, taking a look at this latter from an angle that is more geographical than historical 2. The hypothesis put forward by Michel Foucault, whereby “there is cause to make criticism of this disqualification of space which has held sway through many a generation 3”, upholds the present geographical challenge. The discipline has been affected, since the 1990s, by a cultural turning-point “focused on human experience on earth, the sense of places, territoriality, rootedness and the meaning of landscapes 4”. The first three sequences of the exhibition – “Territorial Strata”, “Vertical Landscapes” and “Corporal Spheres” — weave a shared spatial metaphor in order to broach places and territories endowed with many meanings, be they personal or shared, familiar or unfamiliar, known or imagined. The urban, social, political and ecological space nurtures representations which all the artists summoned question as to their future development. Specific recourse to interactive arrangements and immersive environments encourages an understanding of the physical dimension inherent to the experience of the geographical subject. Because it is not a matter of forgetting about the role of the body in the establishment of knowledge and know-how to do with space 5. Lastly, the fourth section of the circuit — titled “Ascensional Horizons” — which opens with a preamble about atmospheric sciences, presents one or two exploratory projects, both short- and long-term, on the boundaries of space and the undersea realm. “Space Lapse" 6 The double installation set up by the horticultural engineer Gilles Clément, author of the Manifesto of the Third Landscape, and the botanist Patrick Blanc, inventor of the “plant wall”, brings nature, once again, to the foreground of the urban context 17. The former develops, in greater depth and by stages, a global political geophilosophy correlating the “Third Landscape”, made up of abandoned territories, and the extension of biodiversity. Working on a temporary fallow plot situated behind the Grande Arche or Great Arch, in the district of Nanterre, Gilles Clément borrows from the geographical discourse “an omnipresent figure: the figure of the inventory, or catalogue. And this type of inventory factors in the threefold register of survey, measurement and examination 18” (cat. p. 300). The project statement must be linked to its initial prospect, namely the discovery of photographs of the Earth taken from space, which Jacques Leenhardt comments upon as follows: “Clément started out from a personal experience, but one that was also the experience of a whole generation, in which he sees appearing nothing less than an epistemological cut in the representation of the world: Earth seen from the moon. This planet, on which men set foot and whose spatial organization has, up until the 1960s, been determined essentially by a viewpoint rooted in a local feeling of belonging, was perceived, from one day to the next, as a whole entity whose horizon was thenceforth the entire universe 19”. Otherwise put, going beyond the exploratory horizon sent back by the image of Earth, sketching a relationship of “triangulation that connects man to man no longer in a direct way, but from the world’s heights”, also gets the individual to “see himself in the world” and no longer “to see the world based on himself 20”. |
This kind of epistemological and theoretical break certainly lends a quite different scope to the analysis of nature in geography. A real significance is here conferred upon the movement “which engrams the physical and the biological in the form of the natural within society, a movement which comes across in and through space, and is expressed therein, too 21”. For two similar arrangements presented in the exhibition, its capture proceeds from a collection that is at once random and selective. As much in the streets of Paris, where the English designer Jasper Morrison strolls, a sharp eye alert to the expressive intelligence of the familiar and commonplace 22, as in the fallow land of Nanterre, where Gilles Clément is at work, the circuits and itineraries display specific floating lines, somewhere between observation and chance, which relate them to “serendipity”. The word was coined in 1754 by the English writer Horace Walpole, author of a collection of fables tracing the lives of the princes of Serendip (present-day Sri Lanka). The geographer Jacques Lévy is of the opinion that “serendipity is part and parcel of what we can call the world of virtualities in a city, the possibility of unforeseen interactions, specifically those made possible by multi-sensorial contact in public places, [which] give access to unexpected finds, when the potential is realized 23”. Later on in this catalogue, the city planner François Ascher interprets the potential of all this, especially in the urban context (cat. p. 269). Lastly, the boldest architectural representation of forms of urban mobility, in their time-frames and at their differing speeds, is presented in the “Paris Airs” exhibition by the architect Zaha Hadid. The multi-modal infrastructure of Hoenheim, north of Strasbourg (cat. p. 272) here makes reference to a kind of so-called “seamless 24)urban itinerantness, providing continuity of movement (walking, cycling, driving, taking trams and trains). Space introduces “a topological line of thought 25” about which the architect and philosopher Greg Lynn has this to say: “The introduction of the tempo and techniques of movement into architecture is not merely a visual phenomenon […]. Another obvious aesthetic repercussion of these spatial models is the predominance of techniques of deformation and transformation applied in a temporal system of flexible topological surfaces 26”. The modelling of vectorial dynamics here brings in concepts developed by mathematics, such as notions of junction, orientation, connectivity, compactness 27, and so on. Intermezzo (or: The Growth of Horizons) Geography and Narratives The choice of geographical statement adopted for this introduction leads to a further parallel consideration of two narratives of the contemporary individual within a now worldwide geopolitical context. The goal of the political proposal of the Campement urbain.Urban Camp collective is to make the world a category symmetrical with and complementary to the category of citizen. This collective, made up of an architect-cum-city planner, a visual artist, and a sociologist, is well acquainted with Sevran, a town in the Paris region (cat. p. 288). It imagines confronting the town’s populace, with all of its 67 different nationalities revealed in a recent census, with the process of representing the town hall (the present-day building was built, prefabricated, in the 1970s). Everyone is thus invited to depict for themselves a “World-Town Hall”, whose formulation, incidentally, calls to mind the “World- Society” formulation by Jürgen Habermas, who foresaw, after the collapse of the Nation-State, the advent of a deliberative democracy. Confronting its constituents with the republican edifice in any event re-established political action, and this in a post-colonial context of changes of both scale and nature, affecting identity-related phenomena and perceptions of otherness 40. Lastly, and especially for this catalogue accompanying the “Paris Airs” exhibition, the architects Laurent Gutierrez and Valérie Portefaix (Map Office) who live and work in Hong Kong, have produced the comic strip which duly winds up the introduction. By being part and parcel of the revival of geopolitical studies, their “strategic study”, to use their own expression, narrates the spatial challenges of contemporary globalization. As it happens, this study echoes the current strategic, political and economic controversies over the installation of French companies in China. “The themes are: tours in Paris, the Pompidou Centre in Shanghai, the Olympic Games and the rivalry between Paris and Beijing, Chinatown, Chinese immigration, environment / energy / infrastructure, and a critique of the nature of the development /image ofParis. [...] In a quirky dialogue [...], these characters might be able to construct a new utopia for Paris”, and also, not without wit, give a very free-wheeling interpretation to the project involving the establishment of a Pompidou Centre in China! — From the Airs de Paris Catalogue, |
NOTES 1.“Star Trek : Scotty dans l’espace”, website : www.unificationfrance.com/article.php3? id_article=1861. 2. See Olivier Lazzarotti, Habiter. La Condition géographique,Paris, Belin, 2006, p. 256-267, and p. 90 : “This is how, nowadays, the terms are set forth for a human condition that amplifies the place, role, scope and significance of geography”. It is worth remembering that the first “geographical cafés”, designed on the basis of the philosophical café model, appeared in 1998. 3. “Questions à Michel Foucault sur la géographie”, by Yves Lacoste, Hérodote,no 1, January-March 1976, republished in M. Foucault, Dits et écrits. 1954-1988,vol. III, 1976-1979, Paris, Gallimard, “NRF”, 1994, p. 28-40. 4. Jacques Lévy, Michel Lussault, Dictionnaire de la géographie et de l’espace des sociétés,Paris, Belin, 2003, article “Histoire de la géographie”, p. 464. 5. Ibid., article “Corps”, p. 213. The origin of this study is attributed to the feminist trend of English language geography. 6. Georges Perec, Espèces d’espace,Paris, Galilée, 1974. The poetic title refers to the analysis ofmobility made in particular by Bruno Marzloff, Mobilités.Trajectoires fluides, LaTour d’Aigues, L’Aube, 2005, and by the same author, “Du Web à la ville. Les mobilités de l’homme radar”, Urbanisme, no348, May-June 2006, p. 87-92. 7. Cat. p. 265. 8. Plan 52. 9. Bruno Latour and Émilie Hermant (photographer), Paris. Ville invisible,Paris, Les Empêcheurs de penser en rond, 1998, p. 150. 10. B. Latour, Changer de société. Refaire de la sociologie,Paris, Éditions de La Découverte, 2006, see p. 259 and p.299. 11. Bénédikte Zitouni, “Paris. Ville invisible–un diorama sociologique”, www.ethnographiques.org/2004/zitouni. html. See also the article by de Bruno Latour below, p. 260. 12. B. Latour, Changer de société,op. cit., note 10, p. 351-352. |
13. Béatrice Jérôme, “La politique de M. Delanoë a permis une baisse de la pollution à Paris“, Le Monde, 20 December 2006.
14. Elisa Giaccardi, “Metadesign as an emergent design culture”, Leonardo,38.2, August 2005. Gerhard Fischer and E. Giaccardi, “Meta-design, a framework for the future of end-user development”, in H. Liebermann, F. Paterno, V. Wulf (eds.), End user development, empowering people to employ flexibility, advanced information and communication technology,Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers. See the website www.lab-au.com, and the online interview of Lars Spuybroek (NOX) at www.vividvormgeving.nl/vormgeverpagi na/spuybroeknrc.htm. 15. “Metadesign can be defined as a praxis based on the understanding of the systems of logic inherent to information and communication technologies focusing on the formalisation and transcription of information processes in textual, graphique, spatial and multidimensionnel forms”, L’Arca, no178, February 2003, www.lab-au.com/files/doc/arca1-fr.htm. 16. Corinne Bensimon, “Les sauvages sont dans la ville”, Libération,28 October 2006. The census was carried out by the Museum, at the request of the Apur, and published in the form of an Atlas de la nature à Paris,Paris, Le Passage, 2006. 17. “De paysage en outre-pays”, Le Débat, “Au-delà du paysage moderne”, Pierre Nora (dir.), no65, May-August 1991, p. 4, quotes Augustin Berque : “Landscape is not environment. Environment is the factual side of a setting (milieu) (i.e. of the relation of a society to space and nature), landscape is the perceptible side of this relation”. 18.“Questions à Michel Foucault sur la géographie”, op. cit. 19. See the excerpt from the book by Jacques Leenhardt, sociologist and director of studies at the l’EHESS, “Le jardin planétaire, jardin inconnu. Sur le travail paysagiste de Gilles Clément”, forthcoming in Michel Conan (ed.), Contemporary Garden Art and Aesthetic Experience,Washington DC, Dumbarton Oaks and Spacemake Press, 2006, quoted by Louisa Jones in Gilles Clément. Une écologie humaniste, Paris, La Martinière, Aubanel, 2006, p. 253 and 254. See also, p. 76 et 80, this comment by Louisa Jones :“Clément discovers the Third Landscape when, in 2002, photos of the earth seen from space show him a landscape in the Limoges region divided into managed croplands and forests – two forms of monocultures – interspersed by abandoned land. These fringe areas are valuable reservoirs for the mechanisms of biodiversity, and far more threatened still than in 1985”. 20. O. Lazzarotti, Habiter. La Condition géographique,op. cit., p. 120-121. 21. J. Lévy, M. Lussault, Dictionnaire de la géographie..., op. cit., article “Nature”, p. 659. 22. Cat. p. 278. 23. Jacques Lévy, “Serendipity”, Espacestemps.net, Mensuelles, 13 01 2004, may be consulted at www.espcestemps.net/document519.html. 24. See B. Marzloff, Mobilités. Trajectires fluides,op. cit., p. 31, as well as note 45, which refers to the research programmes of “seamless multimodal mobility“ undertaken by the universities of Eindhoven and Delft. See also: http://cttrailf.ct.tudelft.nl. 25. The philosopher Peter Sloterdijk notes “the triumph of topological thinking in the 20th century” in LePalais de cristal. À l’intérieur du capitalisme planétaire, translated from the German by Olivier Mannoni, Paris, Maren Sell Éditeurs, 2006, p. 55. |
26. Greg Lynn, Animate form,New York, Princeton Architectural Press, 1999, quoted by Mahesh Senagala, “Speed and relativity: toward time-like architecture”. See also “Variations calculées”, in Frédéric Migayrou (ed.), Architectures non standard,Paris,Centre Pompidou, 2003, p. 90-92, and in the same catalogue, Mark Burry, “Demain, la production numérique et architecturale”, p. 42-47. 27. J. Lévy and M. Lussault, Dictionnaire de la géographie..., op. cit., articles “Topologie”, p. 928-929, and “Géographie et mathématique”, p. 594- 597. 28. Jeremy Rifkin, L’Âge de l’accès. La révolution de la nouvelle économie,translated from the American by Marc Saint-Upéry, Paris, Éditions de La Découverte, 2000, p. 235-237. See also André Gorz, L’Immatériel. Connaissance, valeur et capital, Paris, Galilée, 2003, p. 48. 29. J. Rifkin, op. cit., p. 267. See also p. 349-355. 30. The space age was ushered in on 4 October 1957 with the launch of Sputnik, the first Russian satellite, followed by the first man in space (12 April 1961) and man’s first steps in the Moon (20 July 1969). 31. William J. Clancey, “Coming soon, Mars film structure”, Traversées, Paris, Paris-Musées, 2001, unpublished. (exh. Cat. at the Musée d’art moderne de la Ville de Paris, 25 October 2001-6 January 2002). See also the catalogue of the Art Outsiders Festival 2003, Space Art, Anomalie Digital Arts,no4, Emanuele Quinz, Jean-Luc Soret and Annick Bureaud (eds.), Orléans, Hyx, 2003. 32. J. Lévy, M. Lussault, Dictionnaire de la géographie..., op. cit., article “Imaginaire géographique”, p. 489-491. 33. Michel Foucault, “Des espaces autres”, lecture given at the Cercle d’études architecturales on 14 March 1967, published in Architecture, Mouvement, Continuité, no 5, October 1984, p. 46-49, republished in Dits et écrits, 1954-1988,vol. IV, 1980-1988, Paris, Gallimard, “NRF”, 1994, p. 76. 34. Ibid. 35. P. Sloterdijk, Le Palais de cristal,op. cit., p. 35-36. 36. J. Lévy, M. Lussault, Dictionnaire de la géographie..., op. cit., article “Imaginaire géographique”, p. 490-491. 37. Voir Gaëlle Dupont, “La fièvre des mégapoles”, LeMonde,8-9 October 2006, p 16 : “The year 2007 will be marked by an unprecedented turning-point in the history of humankind. For the first time, the world’s urban population will exceed its rural population” (UN Habitat Programme). 38. Since the International Meeting of Astronomers on the unfavourable impacts of the environment on astronomy, 30 June- 2July 1992, Unesco, Paris. 39. These formulations are inspired from Peter Sloterdijk, Le Palais de cristal, op. cit., p. 218. 40. See J. Lévy, M. Lussault, Dictionnaire de la géographie..., op. cit., articles “Société-Monde”, p. 856, and “Économie-Monde”, p. 293. |
HeHe (Helen Evans et Heiko Hansen), Étude préparatoire pour le dispositif Champs d’ozone, conçu pour l’exposition Airs de Paris, montage photographique, 2006, © HeHe. |
HeHe (Helen Evans et Heiko Hansen), Étude préparatoire pour le dispositif Champs d’ozone, conçu pour l’exposition Airs de Paris, montage photographique, 2006, © HeHe. |